News:

Harry Potter Fan - 100% has been online for 20 years
Please help support this site by visiting our partners www.forbiddenplanet.com for lots of cool Harry Potter Merch!
CLICK HERE!
A small percentage of each sale goes towards the upkeep of the site.

Main Menu

What do YOU think will happen in book 7?

Started by Snapes_mistress, July 23, 2005, 03:47:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Neo

If Harry's scar is the last horcrux that would mean that he would have to commit suicide and then someone else would have to kill Voldemort. I don't think J.K. is gonna put that in her novel...

And Snape is definatly not on the Order's side.
"Without a common power to keep them in check, there will be no advancement, and the life of man is poor, solitary, nasty, brutish, and short."~Thomas Hobbes

uNoPoh

You don't think its possible, that Snape is on the Orders side?
Why not?
I think, he discussed the unbreakable vow with Dumbledore and Dumbledore agreed, that he (Snape) will have to kill him. In the beginning Snape didn't want to kill him, that could have been the discussion between Snape and Dumbledore.

But its just a theory - I just don't believe, that Snape is really this evil.

And I don't see why Harry (the Horcrux) must be destroyed before Voldemort is going to be killed. What would have happened to Voldemorts spirit, if all his horcruxes would have been destroyed after he failed to kill harry? Do we know that?
Everybody has the right to be stupid
and it has come to my attention that you are abusing your privileges!

Neo

But wouldn't by discussing with Dumbledore about the Vow Snape would be breaking the Vow?

Harry would have to die if he is the last horcrux because only after all the horcruxes are destroyed can Voldemort then be killed. The horcruxes can only be destroyed, therefore it would lead to harry's death.

And I don't understand your last question.
"Without a common power to keep them in check, there will be no advancement, and the life of man is poor, solitary, nasty, brutish, and short."~Thomas Hobbes

uNoPoh

Wasn't the point of the unbreakable vow, that Snape must protect Draco and help him in fulfilling Voldemorts will - in other words to kill Dumbledore? I don't know the passage where the vow is discussed word for word, but I understood it that way:
Snape must protect Draco and help him kill Dumbledore. If he told this Dumbledore, he would not have broken the vow. At least this is what I think. What do you think?

Yes I also think, Harry has to die, if he is the last horcrux, or its somehow only the scar, and he looses the scar and by this way, he looses all his magical power. However since Rowling says he becomes a great wizard this is not likely.

My last question:
The spirit of Voldemort only survived, because a part of his soul or spiritual energy or spiritual essence was conserved in the horcruxes. He had not regained his body so far. What would happen to someone who only exists because of the remaining horcruxes, when these parts of his spiritual energy are destroyed, as long as he has not regained his body. Would he cease to exist? I don't know.
But I doubt, that it is possible for me to understand the concept of horcruxes by pure logic.
Everybody has the right to be stupid
and it has come to my attention that you are abusing your privileges!

Artemis Fowl

I think Wormtail kills Nagini with his silver hand.

Neo

Quote from: uNoPoh on March 23, 2006, 04:58:07 AM
Wasn't the point of the unbreakable vow, that Snape must protect Draco and help him in fulfilling Voldemorts will - in other words to kill Dumbledore? I don't know the passage where the vow is discussed word for word, but I understood it that way:
Snape must protect Draco and help him kill Dumbledore. If he told this Dumbledore, he would not have broken the vow. At least this is what I think. What do you think?

I think that by saying something he would be breaking the vow because he could, potentially, be putting Draco at risk by telling others about the Vow. Dumbledore would not have harmed him, but magic does not think like that, it would realize a potential risk, and neutralize the threat.


QuoteMy last question:
The spirit of Voldemort only survived, because a part of his soul or spiritual energy or spiritual essence was conserved in the horcruxes. He had not regained his body so far. What would happen to someone who only exists because of the remaining horcruxes, when these parts of his spiritual energy are destroyed, as long as he has not regained his body. Would he cease to exist? I don't know.
But I doubt, that it is possible for me to understand the concept of horcruxes by pure logic.

He would have survived, because the last part of his soul is him. He split his soul and put it into the horcruxes, but the last part is in his body, even when he didn't have a body, he stil possessed his spirit, so he would have survived anyway.
"Without a common power to keep them in check, there will be no advancement, and the life of man is poor, solitary, nasty, brutish, and short."~Thomas Hobbes

uNoPoh

About the vow I disagree with you. I don't think that the potential risk would count. Also because Dumbledore always protects his students - he would never harm them.

About the horcrux, I think you are right. Although I dont understand the concept in the book fully. But thats magic and as a muggle I dont have a clue  ;)
Everybody has the right to be stupid
and it has come to my attention that you are abusing your privileges!

jon weasley

yeah? for some reason i think ur just sayin stuff off the top of ur head
7  1/2 days till the deathly hallows!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nicky Tennant

Well,I think Harry will die.If Voldemort dies,it will be too...ordinary.Good guys win,bad guys die.Dunno.I think it'd be better if Harry dies.