Harry Potter Fan

Harry Potter Fan News, Views & Info => Debating Circle => Topic started by: Fawkes on May 6, 2004, 11:51:49 AM

Title: Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: Fawkes on May 6, 2004, 11:51:49 AM
I got this topic from one of the Harry Potter sites. Here it is:
------------------------------------------

Actor Richard Griffiths' agent told Newsround Online that Richard was "very disappointed" not to be appearing as Uncle Vernon in the film.

Griffiths also told a newspaper that he was hoping for a fans' revolt.

He said he'd even asked JK Rowling to try and get his character re-instated, but the fourth book is very long.

Griffiths is reported as saying "I said to JK Rowling: "Couldn't the Dursleys turn up to an open day at Harry's school or something,' but she said, 'I don't think so'."

The book of The Goblet of Fire is so long that there as no way that the filmmakers could fit everything into the movie.

It now looks as if the action will start at The Burrow or the Quidditch World Cup.

Although he says he won't be in this film, Richard Griffith says he's hoping to be back for Order of the Phoenix.
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: Jin Kazama on May 7, 2004, 08:25:24 PM
Thanx 4 the news Fawkes ;)
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: Fawkes on May 9, 2004, 01:54:33 PM
Your welcome, Parvati! ;)
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: Kiara Johnson on May 10, 2004, 04:07:23 AM
cool thanks.  and I trhink it makes perfect sense not to start at the Dursley's this time.  I know th=e book is long and I knew they'd have to cut a lot of parts from it for the movie.  This, is just one that can be easily cut with out hurting the original story.
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: Ginny Weasly on May 10, 2004, 04:08:55 AM
Yeah, I'd rather they cut this than something like the dragons
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: Fawkes on May 10, 2004, 05:49:28 PM
Quote from: Ginny Weasly on May 10, 2004, 04:08:55 AM
Yeah, I'd rather they cut this than something like the dragons
yeah or anything else from the triwizard tournament.
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: Sabastian on May 12, 2004, 07:14:58 PM
Yes, to cut somethig from the TWT would be awfull.  I woul dhave to kill the whole lot of em'   ;)
Title: Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: Fawkes on May 12, 2004, 09:14:35 PM
lol ;D
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: Ginny Weasly on May 13, 2004, 04:45:34 AM
*gets out a kinfe* Can I help?
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: AcId_BrOoZ on June 28, 2004, 02:28:06 AM
yea, 'tis good that they don't start it with the dursleys. ;D
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: googl on July 15, 2004, 04:22:05 PM
Do u think I always thought the Dursleys were funny....Especailly Dudley,,,,Wider than he was talll>LOL ;D
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: pig on July 16, 2004, 06:55:18 AM
 yea fuuny but ile miss seeing the tonge tye tofffe and the weasleys geting stuck in the fire place
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: emily824 on July 28, 2004, 10:17:28 AM
it all has to do with this really stupid new director! i mean what's the deal he's changing everything! like in the POA, he changed where the whomping willow was located as well as Hagrid's hut! i mean what's up with that?! and the quidditch robes changed and those stupid goggles! UUUUURRRRGGGHHH sorry he just ruined the movies!
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: Fawkes on July 28, 2004, 02:35:10 PM
The director has to change some things to suit the movie. I don't know why they changed what you mentioned but yeah...
Title: Re:Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: ronweazley122 on August 19, 2005, 08:34:01 AM
Quote from: emily824 on July 28, 2004, 10:17:28 AM
it all has to do with this really stupid new director! i mean what's the deal he's changing everything! like in the POA, he changed where the whomping willow was located as well as Hagrid's hut! i mean what's up with that?! and the quidditch robes changed and those stupid goggles! UUUUURRRRGGGHHH sorry he just ruined the movies!
...HE didn't direct the goblet of fire.Cuaron was a good director,but they made way to many cuts.It was excellent movie wise,but...They cut way to much out.Anyway,theres a new director at the moment.
Title: Re: Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: 0612 on August 20, 2005, 08:57:22 AM
The Dursleys are so pathetic I'd rather live without them ;D

And ronweazley was right, the director for Movie 3 and Movie 4 are two different people. But then, quite true, I didn't like Cuaron's style. I just hope the new director's better... (Wait. Who is the new director? ;D)
Title: Re: Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: Fawkes on August 20, 2005, 04:14:01 PM
Mike Newell.
I hope he's better too! Cuaron's style was the worst! :P
Title: Re: Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: LavyBrown on August 21, 2005, 05:31:35 AM
I liked his style. He made it seem like the emotions of the charaters are moving somewhere unlike Chris in moive 2.
Title: Re: Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: Fawkes on August 21, 2005, 05:31:07 PM
Quote from: LavyBrown on August 21, 2005, 05:31:35 AM
I liked his style. He made it seem like the emotions of the charaters are moving somewhere unlike Chris in moive 2.
I kind of agree with you.. You see if Cauron had directed another movie it might have been good but IMO he didn't do well at all in HP :P
Title: Re: Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: ronweazley122 on August 22, 2005, 09:26:12 AM
I don't know,I liked the darkness he brought the movie...But some of his ideas were ridiculous.He threw out their uniforms,giving them "Street" clothes...(harry is suppose to have gotten hand me downs from dudley!looked like gap to me..)and,the shrunken head,the ridiculous animal sounds scene...it goes on and on.but,I've realized,as far as editing goes,Directors don't have the final say.
Title: Re: Dursleys not in GOF!
Post by: jon weasley on September 28, 2005, 07:25:34 AM
that sucks