Harry Potter Fan

Harry Potter Fan News, Views & Info => Harry Potter Movies => Topic started by: ronweazley122 on August 10, 2004, 06:53:01 AM

Title: J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: ronweazley122 on August 10, 2004, 06:53:01 AM
Does any one else think J.K. caved waaaaaaay to much on the third movie?
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: brian on August 10, 2004, 06:55:18 AM
HELL YEAH! SHE SHOULD HAVE STEPPED IN OR SAID SOMETHING ABOUT THE SCRIPT AS SOON AS SHE SAW IT
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: ronweazley122 on August 10, 2004, 06:57:52 AM
I KNOW!!!!I almost yelled when they had a choir,saw the shrunken head,and how he constantly made jokes in the most serious scenes,And I hated the shack scene,it was tooo short.
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: brian on August 10, 2004, 07:02:25 AM
the whole thing was way too short, and the quidditch sucked, and i wanted to see draco get the crap scared out of him by a patronus, but noooo there wasnt enough money too add a scene like that.
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: ronweazley122 on August 10, 2004, 07:08:31 AM
it was probably,all the scenes where they randomly showed nature for no reason.
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: brian on August 10, 2004, 07:14:35 AM
thats true, like the random "look at me im flying a hippogriff but i shouldnt be enjoying it because really it should be like, ow my balls"
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: ronweazley122 on August 10, 2004, 07:15:49 AM
I didn't mind that,It was "THE PASSAGE OF TIME,WITHOUT ANY CHARACTERS"scenes,I had a problem with.
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: brian on August 10, 2004, 07:18:24 AM
and Draco looks like a fruit, not that he isnt or anything...
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: ronweazley122 on August 10, 2004, 07:20:48 AM
I know....where do they get off changing hairstyles in the MIDDLE of a series of movies?
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: brian on August 10, 2004, 07:30:51 AM
and bartenders, and im still confused, was that tom at the leaky cauldron?
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: ronweazley122 on August 10, 2004, 08:09:12 AM
yeah,it was...I don't think cuaron looked into the last two movies,just the books.
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: brian on August 10, 2004, 08:22:07 AM
well no, christopher columbus was still in staff, so he should have known as a producer.
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: ronweazley122 on August 10, 2004, 09:35:19 AM
well,at any rate,he probably hoped no one would notice,cause' tom was only introduced once in the 1st movie.
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: emily824 on August 10, 2004, 10:07:33 AM
ok is it just me or did you feel like you were watching the seasons change then the actual events happening?
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: pig on August 10, 2004, 09:47:02 PM
 yeah i thought it was to short not enought quidditch. you dont even see wood. looking at this film i think the 4th will be worse if they dont make it longer.
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: brian on August 11, 2004, 04:07:30 AM
willl it even have a goblet of fire, or will it just be some other idea to make the movie cheaper to make?
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: Tweetie on August 13, 2004, 02:05:42 AM
With the profits they made of off Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, they could make a really good fourth film.  With a new director, things might be better.

If they didn't use a Goblet of Fire, they would have to change the name of the movie.  Maybe we should be looking forward to Harry Potter and the Cheapest Film in Warner Brothers History next year, instead of GOF. :(
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: brian on August 13, 2004, 03:42:33 AM
lol
Title: Re:J.k. Crumbled.
Post by: DokkenSuite on August 16, 2004, 11:15:59 AM
I can't remember if I read this or I saw it somewhere, but the director just took the main ideas of the movie and just basicly made the movie.